Connect with us

News

America’s Health Care Crisis: Big Spending, Poor Outcomes

It is for this reason that the passage of this report makes such a compelling argument for people to seek for overhaul of the entire American health cares system.

Published

on


United States – The health system in the U.S has crumbled, a shocking new study reveals.

The US ranks last among ten developed countries in three measures of health care: saving lives, in terms of affordability and in guaranteeing equal access to good quality care for all people regardless of gender, ability to pay or where they live, according to the study by The Commonwealth Fund, an independent nonprofit group, released Thursday, as reported by NBC News.

Lowest Life Expectancy and Preventable Deaths

As per recent research, people in the U.S. die youngest and suffer the highest rate of potentially preventable deaths in spite of nearly $2.2 trillion or nearly twice more as a percentage of the gross domestic product being spent on health care more than any other country in this ranking.

Recent polls show that health care is one of the voter concerns in the upcoming November presidential election. Accounting to the Vice President Kamala Harris, expansion on the Affordable Care Act known as Obamacare has been proposed. Former President Donald Trump has offered limited information about his heath care policy; his running mate, JD Vance, has only called for deregulation.

Thursday’s findings are likely to prove, according to the researchers, that the US is actually the country that spends the most but gains the least for its money.

“No other country in the world expects patients and families to pay as much out of pocket for essential health care as they do in the U.S.,” Dr. Joseph Betancourt, the president of The Commonwealth Fund, said on a call Wednesday discussing the new findings.

Ironically, the steep price people pay doesn’t guarantee superior care.

Long Wait Times and Shortages

“We are undersupplied with the things that people need most,” including doctors and hospital beds, Dr. David Blumenthal, the former president of The Commonwealth Fund, said on the call. “That’s one of the reasons why you have to wait so long in the United States for specialty care and one of the reasons why no one can find a primary care physician.”

Thursday’s findings were obtained after consolidating survey responses from tens of thousands of primary care physicians and residents from high-income countries from the past three years.

The researchers examined how the U.S. compared with nine other countries: Australia, Canada, France, Germany, Netherlands, New Zealand, Sweden, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom. Each country was graded into five categories: four key areas include access, the process of care, cost and administrative requirements, equity, and health gains.

Not a single country could be placed at the extremities in all those parameters the statistics presented just now provided. The three countries that were ranked highest overall were Australia, the Netherlands, and the UK. Australia and the Netherlands had the least healthcare expenditure, the report noted.

The researchers pointed out that the US is among seven countries that perform ‘exceptionally’ poorly.

These concerns performed poorly or worse in nearly every benchmark area except one: the care process, in which scores trailed only New Zealand’s. Personalization objects include preventive services such as mammograms and flu vaccinations, as well as patient engagement.

Thus, details such as hospitals’ billing, insurance claims, and out-of-pocket costs, through which the patient and doctors get entangled, place the U.S. only one step ahead of the last place in terms of administration.

Widespread Inequality and Access Issues

The U.S. figured at second last also in equity; more people in lower income brackets said they could not afford the care they required, and more men and women said they had experienced unfair treatment or discrimination.

Most importantly, the U.S. reported the lowest life expectancy and high preventable and treatable excess deaths compounded by the pandemic.

That was up slightly from 76.4 years in 2021, primarily because of COVID-19 as per the most recent CDC data from the United States.

“That is a new finding,” Blumenthal said. “We have never had a pandemic-related finding in a previous report, and it shows that, unfortunately, our general low performance held in our performance on Covid mortality.”

Advanced medical care out of reach for many

Lawrence Gostin, the Georgetown University’s O’Neill Institute for National and Global Health Law director was kind to note that these results corroborate other studies that place the United States among the worst peer countries on almost all major health measures such as life expectancy, child and maternal mortality, health access and fairness.

Gostin pointed out that many of America’s most vulnerable, including racial minorities and people with low incomes, can hardly rely on insurance. Moreover, due to the high charges for facility rendition, many clients surrender the service or postpone obtaining medical care.

In view of this, Gostin summarized the situation, saying, “The United States offers maybe the best health care in the world, but everyone has to pay for it out-of-pocket.” “In a sad cruel irony, quality health care remains a privilege rather than a right.”

Dr. Adam Gaffney, a critical care physician at the Cambridge Health Alliance in Massachusetts, pointed out that the U.S. differs from the other countries in one critical area: free medical treatment for all the citizens of the country.

“A universal health care system can make a difference,” Gaffney said, “not only because everyone is covered and can see a doctor when they need to, but because they have a long-standing health care provider who can provide counsel and advice and treatment and prevention of common conditions.”

In prior Commonwealth Fund surveys, the U.S. was ranked last; however, the researchers attempted to not compare from report to report because the new one changed questions and the countries involved.

Opportunities for Reform

Thursday’s report also provided recommendations that could improve the health of the country’s population, with an emphasis on decreasing the price of medical services and making insurance more accessible, as reported by NBC News.

“The shortcomings of the United States are clear from this international analysis, but so are the opportunities for change,” said Reginald Williams II, vice president of the International Health Policy and Practice Innovations program at The Commonwealth Fund.

Continue Reading

News

Clock Ticking: US Rushes for Universal Bird Flu Vaccine by 2029 

The US Department of Health and Human Services has launched an ambitious initiative to develop a universal flu vaccine within four years. 

Published

on

By

United States: In a sweeping scientific endeavor unmatched in nearly half a century, the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) declared its mission to fabricate a universal influenza inoculation within the next four years—one that could outmaneuver numerous mutating viral strains, including the highly pathogenic H5N1 avian flu. 

“This is not incremental—it’s a cataclysmic recalibration,” stated Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, Director of the National Institutes of Health, as he unveiled the transformative project, Generation Gold Standard. “This isn’t just about today’s viral shadows—it’s about preempting tomorrow’s contagions using reimagined conventional vaccine craft.” 

Hatched within the corridors of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, the plan has its sights set on gaining FDA sanction for a pan-influenza vaccine by 2029. Human trials are penciled in for next year. The initial disclosure came via The Wall Street Journal, confirming that the initiative would be underpinned by a $500 million infusion from the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority, a figure corroborated by HHS spokespeople, according to CNN. 

“I want this to succeed,” offered Dr. Paul Offit of the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, a veteran of influenza vaccine research. “This field isn’t barren from apathy nor drained of brilliance or funds. It’s simply an enormous biological conundrum.” 

Influenza viruses mutate with a capriciousness that has continually outpaced all-encompassing immunization. As a result, the populace is prodded each year with revised formulations tailored to prevailing strains. 

HHS’s gambit echoes its similar ambition in the COVID-19 sphere: to birth a universal coronavirus vaccine that shields not just against SARS-CoV-2, but its ominous kin, SARS-CoV-1 and MERS-CoV. 

An Audacious Leap with Anachronistic Tools 

Ironically, the engine of this cutting-edge aspiration is an old-school vaccine strategy: inactivated whole-virus methodology. Here, pathogens are chemically muted to prevent infection but still provoke an immune response. This strand of research is helmed by Dr. Matthew Memoli and Dr. Jeffery Taubenberger at NIH. 

Dr. Memoli, who courted headlines in 2021 for rebuffing COVID vaccine mandates and declining the jab himself, described one candidate nasal vaccine as “an immune simulator, echoing the body’s response to an authentic flu invasion,” as per reports by CNN. 

External experts—though applauding the vision—have voiced skepticism about feasibility. 

Dr. Greg Poland of the Mayo Clinic delineated the scientific gold standard: a universal flu jab should grant at least 75% protection against both A and B strains for a full year or more across all age brackets. However, Poland critiqued the project’s top contender, BPL-1357, for only containing A-strain variants. “This suggests they’re eyeing potential pandemic instigators, not the seasonal usual suspects,” he surmised. 

Poland also bristled at the decision to bet big on a vaccine archetype largely shelved by modern virology. “It feels like constructing a spacecraft with blueprints from the Wright brothers,” he mused. 

While whole-virus formulations deliver multi-pronged immune training, their broad exposure can boomerang, triggering excessive immune reactions or adverse events. Such vaccines are often cultivated in egg or cell mediums—this initiative uses canine kidney cells. Viruses are chemically disarmed using beta-propiolactone before being packaged into injections or nasal sprays. 

Historically, the US pivoted from these inactivated whole-virus methods to subtler options—like split-virus or subunit vaccines. Some nations, however, still employ the full-virus strategy, according to CNN. 

Dr. Peter Hotez from Texas Children’s Hospital warned of history repeating. He invoked the 1976 swine flu debacle when a robust vaccine reaction led to a surge in Guillain-Barré syndrome. Hotez labeled whole-virus methods “highly reactogenic,” underscoring their propensity to overstimulate the immune system. 

“It’s baffling why they’re doubling down on such a volatile platform,” Hotez confessed. 

Revamping the Rules of Vaccine Approval 

On the eve of its universal vaccine pronouncement, HHS quietly dropped a regulatory bombshell: henceforth, all new vaccines must undergo rigorous placebo-controlled trials before greenlighting. A seismic deviation from norms, this shift could bottleneck annual COVID shot rollouts. 

Previously, the FDA emulated its flu model—only updating strains within the vaccine and skipping full trials. This strategy fast-tracked annual boosters aligned with dominant strains. 

Dr. Offit noted, “Changing the strain gives us sharper antibody defenses for a few months—crucial for the elderly and frail.” Delays from mandatory trials could jeopardize vulnerable lives during flu and COVID seasons, according to CNN. 

Though HHS hasn’t clarified if this edict applies to updated COVID jabs, one official told CNN it was about reinstating gold-standard science for newer mRNA-based vaccines, distinguishing them from long-tested flu inoculations. 

Confusion deepened when the FDA missed its April 1 decision deadline for full approval of Novavax’s non-mRNA COVID vaccine. The company later disclosed that the FDA had requested post-approval clinical trials, signaling a possible precedent for future vaccines, including updates from Moderna and Pfizer. 

Moderna, in a recent investor call, downplayed concerns, assuring it was “business as usual.” However, uncertainty looms over whether the FDA concurs. Decisions on Moderna’s next-gen COVID vaccine and RSV expansion are expected by late May and June, respectively. Approval for its combined flu-COVID jab has been pushed to 2026, pending more data. 

The firm also announced it would pull back from developing combo vaccines for those under 50, pivoting towards oncology and elder care. 

A Shifting Landscape and Growing Tensions 

If the FDA locks in this new trial standard, it marks a philosophical U-turn. “They had adopted a flu-style model for COVID boosters. Now they’re unraveling it,” noted Dorit Reiss, a law professor at UC Law San Francisco, as per CNN. 

The FDA has already penciled in a May 22 meeting to discuss which COVID strains should feature in the next vaccine cycle. 

HHS didn’t stop at trials. It also lambasted current vaccine safety surveillance tools—like VAERS and the Vaccine Safety Datalink—as outdated and ineffective. The agency vowed to construct new systems to better track vaccine benefits and harms. 

This contradicts a commitment Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. allegedly made to Sen. Bill Cassidy in February: to avoid creating parallel monitoring infrastructures. 

Sen. Cassidy, a physician and Republican, reiterated his backing for universal vaccines, calling them the “Holy Grail” against fast-mutating foes. But he cautioned against overhauling approval systems for updated shots: “If the original vaccine has proven safe, we shouldn’t withhold access just to fulfill trial quotas.” 

Continue Reading

News

New Discovery: 5 Blood Proteins Could Foreshadow Liver Illness Over a Decade Early 

A study pinpoints five elusive blood proteins that can flag severe liver illness up to 16 years before symptoms strike, offering a chance of prolonged health. 

Published

on

By

Forecasting ailments long before their grip tightens could shift the medical realm from reactive to preventative. A group of researchers has spotlighted five subtle yet potent blood proteins capable of forewarning an individual’s odds of enduring an advanced liver malady—well over a decade before it manifests. These transformative revelations, slated for unveiling at Digestive Disease Week (DDW) 2025, unlock avenues for swifter detection, swifter actions, and, perhaps, superior outcomes. 

Silent Surge of MASLD 

This research zeroes in on metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), a silent epidemic now reigning as the foremost liver disease worldwide. The frequency of MASLD continues to swell, dragging along a fatality risk that towers nearly twofold over those untouched by it. 

Whispers from Within: The Biomarker Breakthrough 

“Picture having foresight into MASLD’s threat long before it stirs,” shared Dr. Shiyi Yu, a resident in gastroenterology at Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital, China. “Most only recognize liver peril after it clenches tight. There’s a dire craving for reliable biomarkers and forecasting blueprints. Our endeavor uncovers plasma proteins as harbingers of hope,” according to SciTechDaily.com. 

Drilling into over 50,000 blood specimens from the UK Biobank and tracing participants for 16+ years, researchers scrutinized over 2,700 distinct proteins. From this biological sea, five proteins surfaced as early harbingers: CDHR2, FUOM, KRT18, ACY1, and GGT1—biochemical whispers of liver calamity to come. 

Numbers That Speak Volumes 

This protein ensemble demonstrated a startling foresight: an 83.8 percent predictive edge five years out, tapering only slightly to 75.6 percent at the 16-year mark. When meshed with day-to-day markers like body mass and physical movement, the model’s accuracy surged—hitting 90.4 percent at five years and 82.2 percent across sixteen. 

Dr. Yu added, “Our model echoed its precision in an entirely different group in China, underscoring its resilience and broad applicability,” as per SciTechDaily.com. 

Still Waters Run Deep 

Despite its brilliance, the study remains observational—it detects links, not causes. But with pathways still being explored, this discovery ushers in a fresh frontier, where blood murmurs truths long before pain speaks. 

Continue Reading

News

Beloved Spice Could Secretly Sabotage Your Medications, Study Warns – Are You at Risk? 

A recent study reveals cinnamon’s core compound could hasten drug metabolism, undermining the efficacy of prescription medications. Discover the hidden risks behind this cherished spice. 

Published

on

By

Photo: martin-dm/Getty Images

A recent scientific study has flagged an unsuspecting pantry staple as a potential troublemaker in your body’s drug-handling mechanics — cinnamon. 

Beneath its warm aroma and nostalgic taste, researchers at the University of Mississippi have identified cinnamaldehyde — the chief aromatic in cinnamon — as a molecular agitator. This compound can awaken certain cellular gateways (receptors) that speed up how your body clears specific medications, possibly rendering them less potent than intended. 

While a sprinkle atop your cappuccino likely won’t stir trouble, the study casts a cautionary spotlight on high-dosage consumption, especially via supplements, according to the New York Post. 

Dosing Dangers Lurking in Plain Sight 

“Health hazards may arise if hefty volumes of supplements are ingested without a clinician’s awareness or guidance,” stated Shabana Khan, principal researcher on the project. 

Overindulgence could push your system to purge medications prematurely, sabotaging their intended purpose. 

Notably, the study points out that cinnamon oil — a frequent fixture in flavor additives and personal care products — shows minimal risk in this context. It’s the bark, particularly from Cassia cinnamon, that raises eyebrows. 

Cassia vs. Ceylon: A Spicy Identity Crisis 

Cassia cinnamon — a low-cost variety imported from southern China — harbors coumarin, a naturally occurring compound with blood-thinning traits. This could spell danger for individuals already navigating anticoagulant therapies. 

“Ceylon cinnamon, often dubbed ‘true cinnamon’ and sourced from Sri Lanka, bears far less coumarin, making it a safer bet,” explained Amar Chittiboyina, a co-author and deputy director at the National Center for Natural Products Research

Supermarket shelves mostly carry Cassia, cloaked in generic packaging as simple “ground cinnamon.” 

The Fine Line Between Healing and Harm 

Historically, cinnamon has earned praise for its alleged therapeutic potential — from leveling blood sugar to easing inflammation. But this fresh wave of evidence underscores the shadow side of overuse, as per the NY Post. 

People living with long-term health conditions — diabetes, hypertension, autoimmune disorders, or psychological ailments — should tread especially carefully. 

“Our top-line advice: always consult a health care professional before pairing any supplements with prescribed treatments,” Khan emphasized. “Supplements aren’t cures. They’re not crafted to heal, treat, or offset diseases.” 

Tread Gently With Nature’s Power 

Cinnamon might still spice up your life in meaningful ways — but when taken in heavy doses, it may quietly unravel the work of vital medications. 

As with any potent natural remedy, the key lies in mindful use — not blind enthusiasm. 

Continue Reading

Sign Up for Our Newsletter


Join our subscribers list to get the latest news, updates and special offers delivered directly in your inbox.


Trending